目的 通过对两类血吸虫病防治(简称血防)服务实施者的工作效果进行探讨,为推动血防工作纳入公共卫生服务均等化提供科学依据. 方法 在湖北省江陵县选择血吸虫病疫情相仿的虾湖村和万场村,分别按县级血防机构为模式一和乡(镇)卫生院为模式二的血防服务实施主体,采用观察法比较两种血防服务实施主体查灭螺、查治病等服务工时;采取小组访谈方法了解该县所有血吸虫病流行村卫生人员的血防服务内容和意愿;采用优劣势分析法(strengths weakness opportunity threats,SWOT)对上述结果进行分析. 结果 江陵县虾湖村和万场村的常住人口分别为571人和618人,2011年人群推算感染率分别为1.72%和2.01%,两村的血吸虫病疫情相仿.在模式一情况下,每百名居民所需投入血检服务工时为2.57;每百名居民所需投入治疗服务工时为2.67;每百名居民所需投入粪检服务工时为11.94;每百名居民所需投入健康教育服务工时为2.49.在模式二情况下,每百名居民所需投入血检服务工时为2.82;每百名居民所需投入治疗服务工时为3.13;无技术力量开展粪检和查灭螺工作;每百名居民所需投入健康教育服务工时为17.78.对全县10所乡(镇)卫生院、88个村卫生室的负责人员进行访谈,共有90名乡(镇)卫生院院长及村卫生室负
Objective To evaluate the effects of schistosomiasis control service by 2 sorts of implementer for the purpose of bringing schistosomiasis control into the content of equality of public health services.Methods Xiahu and Wanchang villages with similar schistosomiasis endemic situation in Jiangling County were selected as study sites.The implementers were county level of schistosomiasis control as model 1,township health center and village clinic as model 2.The working hours of snail survey and control,disease examination,and treatment were compared by observation method between 2 sorts of implementers.The village clinic staff was interviewed on schistosomiasis control and willingness by focus groups interview.The above data was analysized by strengths weakness opportunity threats (SWOT).Results The residents Xiahu and Wanchang villages were 571 and 618,the calculated human infection rates were 1.72% and 2.01%,the schistosomiasis endemic situation was similar.In model 1,the w