新刑事诉讼法明确规定了非法证据排除的范围和公检法三机关在刑事诉讼活动中都具有对非法证据排除的义务。检察机关作为法律的监督机关,在侦查活动中承担着对侦查活动的监督,在审查起诉阶段对证据的进行核实,审查起诉环节对非法证据的排除直接影响到案件的开庭审理。如果在开庭审理过程中被告人或者辩护人提出非法证据的排除,公诉机关需要证明证据来源的合法性,所以公诉环节对非法证据的排除就显得尤为重要。公诉是检察机关核心的标志性的职能,它担负着指控犯罪与诉讼监督的职能,既是侦查程序审查的把关者,又是审判程序的启动者和诉讼程序的纠错匡正者,如何有效的排除非法证据对于打击犯罪,保障人权,保证法律在诉讼中得到正确实施,维护社会和谐稳定和公平正义意义重大。
The new criminal procedure law explicitly stipulates the scope of illegal evidence exclusion and the obligation of ju-dicial authorities to exclude illegal evidence in criminal proceedings. The procuratorial authority, as the supervising authority of laws, supervises investigating activities, verifies evidences on stage of review and prosecution, and excludes illegal evidences in the public prosecution procedure, which directly imposes influence on the trial on court. If the defendant or the defender comes up with the illegal evidence exclusion, the public prosecution authority needs to prove the legality of the source of evidence. Therefore the illegal evidence exclusion in the public prosecution procedure is particularly important. Public prosecution is the core function of procuratorial authorities and plays the role of crime accusation and prosecution supervision. It guards the pro-cedure of investigation, initiates judicial procedures and corrects prosecution procedures. To exclud