评价使用葛根芩连汤为干预措施进行临床疗效观察的非个案类中英文文献质量。方法:系统检索中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)、万方数据库、PubMed、Embase,同时辅以手工检索以补充以上数据库之不足,检索从以上各数据库建库日起截止到2012年4月。结果:全部216篇文献中,应用随机的文献102篇,占47.22%;使用对照的文献占56.94%;仅4篇文献使用了单盲法,占1.85%。文献质量评分:0分文献27篇,1分文献84篇,2分文献4篇,3分文献7篇,4分文献1篇,5~7分文献0篇。结论:纳入研究的文献质量普遍较低,临床研究的标准化和规范化有待进一步的提高。
Objective:To evaluate the quality of the published clinical researches using Gegen Qinlian Decoction as intervention method written in Chinese/English language .Methods:Both automatic research and manual search were utilized to search clinical research pa -pers published between implementation of the databases and April 2012.The databases search included CNKI , CBM, VIP, Wanfang, Pubmed, Embas.Results:Among a total of 216 papers, 102 used randomization (47.22%), 56.94%used control method, only 4 used single blind method (1.85%).Quality scoring:27 papers score 0 point, 84 papers score 1 point, 4 papers score 2 points, 7 papers score 3 points, 1 paper score 4 points, 0 paper score between 5-7 points.Conclusion:The published clinical papers research in our stud-y is not of high quality in general , efforts should be directed to standardization and regulation of clinical research .