本文指明汉人对《离骚》的创作年代，均有作于怀王和顷襄王时期的自相矛盾之说，并无“均在怀王之世，决无作于顷襄王时期”的“宏观”定论；《离骚》所透露的诗人年岁及“椒、兰”喻指，应在诗人将及“老”年且子兰当政时期，而不能在子兰尚未当政的屈原早年“初疏”时期；以诗中浪漫想象所显示的诗人所在地点及诗中出现的“南楚”、“湘潭”一带土语，证明诗人创作《离骚》时不在汉北或郢中，而是在“南楚”沅湘之间；并引秦汉之际律法证明，屈原时代，实行的是有爵者以“年五十六”为“老”的“告老”退休制度，由此推测诗人之作《离骚》大抵在将临五十六岁老年，且齐相韩夤尚未受命赴楚为相的子兰当政时期，即顷襄王八九年间。

This paper indicated the time of the creation of "Li Sao" by Han raised controversial ideas of the periods of King Huai and King Qingxang. There is no decisive conclusion like "created in King Huai period and of no chance in King Qingxiang period".The poet used the metaphor "pepper, Lan" in "Li Sao " and indicated it should happen when Qu Yuan was nearly old but Zi Lan was ruling but not before Zi Lan was“too young to take the power". The locations in Qu Yuan''s romantic imagination and the terms of dialects of "South Chu" and "Xiangtan" proved that "Li Sao" wasn''t composed by Qu Yuan in the areas of north Han or Ying but between the "South Chu" and"Yuan Xiang". This paper also cited the law of Qin and Han Dynasty to prove that the retiring age in Qin was fifty-six for ranked people so Qu Yuan''s age when he composed"Li Sao" was about fifty-six. And then Han Yin had not been appointed to be the prime minister of Qi and Zi Lan went to Chu to be the prime minister. The time w